News Center: Papers and Articles Archive

“EMF-Inducible in vivo Gene Switch for Remote Spatiotemporal Control of Gene Expression,” Cell, April 14, 2026. This paper from Korea appears to be a game changer: It shows that a 4 kHz pulsed EMF signal can activate a switch that controls gene expression. A physicist tells the New Scientist (April 30) that the claimed biological response is ”incredibly implausible.” On the other hand, a comment published in a Nature journal on August 20 by another Korean group sees great promise for the new Ei switch in medical therapies.

Continues
“Conflicting Views in Experimental Carcinogenesis: a Commentary on Design and Methodological Deficiencies in the Follow-up Validation Studies on RF Radiation,” Environmental Health,July 29, 2026.
“In conclusion, methodological shortcomings due to the design choices in the Japan–Korea studies, specifically the restriction to a single exposure group of 4 W/kg of CDMA-modulated RFR and reduced statistical power, systematically biased the study toward null results and eliminated the possibility of detecting a positive trend.” From ICBE-EMF.

Continues
“Environmental RF Exposure and Genotoxic Biomarkers in Schoolchildren: A Cross-Sectional Analysis,” Scientific Reports, July 9, 2026. These findings suggest that variation in ambient RF exposure from cell towers in school environments may be associated with micronuclei frequency —a biomarker of genomic instability— in children.

Continues
“Neurobiological Interfaces Connecting Environmental Change to Monarch Butterfly Migration,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, August 2026. “Here, we synthesize current knowledge and propose how anthropogenic stressors— artificial light at night, climate warming, and electromagnetic noise— could potentially disrupt the already threatened monarch migration by targeting key neurobiological interfaces that link environmental cues to migratory physiology and behavior.” Butterflies have a blood-brain barrier (BBB) and it’s permeability is affected by environmental conditions. Open access.

Continues
“Microwave-iIduced Modulation of Intracellular Distribution of Peptides Based on Mitochondrial Targeting Sequences,” Scientific Reports, June 11, 2026. “To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate the potential of MWs for delivering peptides conjugated with a signal sequence to the mitochondrial region.” ... “The precise mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear.” From Japan.

Continues
“Disruptive Effects of Brief RF Noise Exposure on Migratory Bat Navigation,” Science, May 28, 2026. “Our experiments show that EM noise exposure disrupts the orientation of bats several hours beyond the exposure period” [emphasis added]. New from Germany’s Oldenburg University. As an accompanying commentary points out: these effects occur with “RF noise at levels that are commonly encountered by wildlife.” Follow the link for another important paper in the same issue of Science.

Continues
“Spatiotemporal Trends of Ambient RF-EMF During the 5G Rollout in Switzerland,” Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, May 7, 2026. From the Univertsity of Basel. “No significant changes in RF-EMF levels, despite an 18-fold increase in data traffic.”

Continues
“Electric Field Strengths and Current Densities Induced Inside the Body due to Exposure to Electronic Article Surveillance (EAS) System Antennas Compared to ICNIRP’s Exposure Limits,” Journal of Radiation Protection, April 1, 2026. “Radiation protection and market regulatory authorities should have a close look and check presently installed and future AM-EAS technology with respect to their compliance to exposure limits.” From the Seibersdorf Labs in Austria. Open access.

Continues
“Exposure Limits to Radiofrequency EMF Do Not Account for Cancer Risk or Reproductive Toxicity Assessed from Data in Experimental Animals,” Environmental Health, March 14, 2026. By Ron Melnick and Joel Moskowitz. Open access. “For the general public, current regulatory limits to RF-EMF are 15- to 900-fold higher than our estimates of exposure levels associated with cancer risk of 1 × 10^–5 (depending on the duration of daily exposure), and 8- to 24-fold higher than levels that are protective of male reproductive health.”

Continues
“Long-Term Residential Magnetic Field Exposure and Neurodegenerative Disease Mortality: An 18-Year Nationwide Cohort Study in Switzerland, Environment International, February 8, 2026 . “Our study supports epidemiological evidence linking residential ELF-MF exposure to dementia risk in the general population, while no associations were found for other neurodegenerative diseases outcomes,” including ALS.

Continues
“Non-Thermal Acceleration of DNA Base Pairing by Sub-Terahertz Irradiation,” Journal of Chemical Physics, February 10, 2026. “We report a non-thermal mechanism by which sub-terahertz (sub-THz) radiation accelerates DNA base pairing in aqueous environment.” From Japan.

Continues
“Biological Effects of Weak Magnetic Fields: Can the Radical-Pair Mechanism Provide a Universal Explanation?” Biological Reviews, December 5, 2025. “The radical-pair mechanism of magnetoreception, likely provided by cryptochrome-4, is not the sole basis for magnetosensitive receptor cells in animals that use the geomagnetic field for orientation during migration.”

Continues
“Identifying Resonant Frequencies of Viruses for Microwave-Based Detection and Inactivation of Pathogenic Viruses,” Scientific Reports, November 27, 2025. “Low-power non-thermal microwave technologies offer a novel strategy for viral detection and inactivation.” The U.S. Air Force has “simulated the dynamic motion of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein using all-atom molecular dynamics simulation. A resonance frequency at 7.3-7.4 GHz has been identified.”

Continues
The journal Bioelectromagnetics has posted a special issue on “Experimental and Numerical Dosimetry for 5G and 6G.” It includes nine papers, all are open access.

Continues
“RF-Induced Gene Expression,” Reviews of Environmental Health, October 29, 2025. A comprehensive assessment by Henry Lai and Blake Levitt. They find: “Gene expression provides a strong argument that RFR affects cellular function”; and “Forty gene expression effects...were observed at a SAR less than 0.4 W/Kg.” They conclude: “They should be considered in the setting of RFR-exposure guidelines.” Open access.

Continues
“Altered Development in Rodent Brain Cells After 900 MHz RF Exposure,” Neurotoxicology, September 2, 2025. RF radiation affects “rodent neurodevelopmental at regulatory threshold levels” —SARs of 0.08 W/Kg and 0.4 W/Kg. From France.

Continues
“A Systematic Review of the Impact of EM Waves on Living Beings,” Cureus, August 17, 2025. “These findings underscore the significant health and environmental risks associated with rising exposure levels of EMF, highlighting the urgent need for strategies to mitigate the risks.”

Continues
“Development and Testing of a Novel Whole-Body Exposure System for Investigative Studies of RF Radiation in Rodents,” NIEHS, August 2025. Describes a prototype for a small-scale RF exposure system to investigate toxicological effects. Studies are needed, they advise, given widespread human exposure to RF radiation from cell phones.

Continues
“A Scoping Review and Evidence Map of RF Exposure and Genotoxicity: Assessing in vivo, in vitro and epidemiological data,” Frontiers in Public Health, July 29, 2025. “The collective evidence reveals that RF-EMF exposures may be genotoxic and could pose a cancer risk.... These findings support the adoption of precautionary measures.”

Continues
“RF EMFs Reduce Bumble Bee Visitation to Flowers,” Environmental Pollution, July 14, 2025. No effect of 2.4 & 5.8 GHz RF on flower visitation rates by honey bees. But there was a “significant reduction” in visits by bumble bees when the plants were exposed to the RF. From Germany.

Continues

A Report on Non-Ionizing Radiation

News Center: Papers and Articles Archive

Pages